O-Level English: How to Write Argumentative Essays on Public Transport (With Useful Phrases)

Public transport is one of the most enduring themes in the syllabus. When students browse through past O-Level essay questions, they frequently encounter topics related to “Social Issues” and “Urban Living.” Examiners love these themes because every student has an opinion on them. You take the bus or MRT to school every day. Naturally, you may feel equipped to write about it.

However, such familiarity can result in predictable and superficial writing.

Because every student uses public transport, every student writes the same generic points: “It is cheap,” “It is fast,” or “Sometimes it breaks down.” To bridge the gap between a B3 and an A1, you need to move beyond surface-level observations. You need to master advanced O-Level English essay writing tips that demonstrate nuance and specific knowledge.

At the O-Level English standard, an argumentative essay is not just about shouting your opinion. It is about persuading the examiner through logic, evidence, and a balanced worldview.

Here is your step-by-step guide to mastering this topic, complete with a model essay breakdown to help you navigate one of the most common O-Level essay topics.

1. The Structure of Persuasion

An A1 argumentative essay is built on a rigid skeleton. Unlike a narrative where you can play with timelines, looking for effective Secondary English composition writing tips often begins with mastering structure. The most effective framework for the O-Level English paper is:

• Introduction: Hook + Context + Thesis Statement (Your Stand)

• Body Paragraph 1: Supporting Argument A

• Body Paragraph 2: Supporting Argument B

• Body Paragraph 3 (The Pivot): The Counter-Argument

• Body Paragraph 4: The Rebuttal

• Conclusion: Summary of points + Final closing thought

The Pro Strategy: Your thesis statement must be crystal clear. Don’t sit on the fence. You must strongly agree or disagree, even if you acknowledge the other side later.

2. Move From General to Specific Evidence

Average students write: “The transport is good because there are many buses.” A1 students write: “The transport is efficient due to the hub-and-spoke model that integrates MRT lines with feeder bus services.“

To score high marks for Content, you need concrete examples. Whether you are tackling essay writing topics in English related to infrastructure or technology, specific nouns ground your argument in reality. You cannot just say “technology helps.” You need to mention SimplyGo, MyTransport.sg, or the Thomson-East Coast Line (TEL).

Here are some practical, exam-ready phrases you can use in your essay:

• Hub-and-spoke model: The integration where the MRT (backbone) connects to buses (feeders).

• Integrated Transport Hubs (ITHs): Air-conditioned interchanges like Bedok or Toa Payoh.

• Certificate of Entitlement (COE): Essential Singaporean context to mention when discussing cars.

• Car-Lite” nation: The specific government goal for Singapore’s future.

• Contactless payment methods (SimplyGo): Specific examples of tech convenience.

• Sporadic breakdowns: Breakdowns that happen irregularly but cause disruption.

• Signal faults: The specific technical term often cited for delays.

• Upgrading the signalling systems: A specific measure taken to fix train faults.

• Lifeline of the nation: A powerful metaphor describing the system’s importance.

3. The Art of the Rebuttal

This is where distinctions are won or lost. A basic essay ignores the flaws of the system. A superior essay acknowledges them but explains why they don’t destroy the main argument.

If you are arguing that the system is efficient, you must mention the breakdowns or overcrowding. If you pretend they don’t exist, your argument looks naive.

The Formula:

• Acknowledge: “Critics argue that…”

• Rebut: “However, this perspective fails to consider…”

4. Upgrade Your Vocabulary Bank

Examiners read hundreds of essays on public transport. If you use the word “good” ten times, you will put them to sleep. Levelling up your vocabulary in O-Level English essays shows maturity.

• Basic: The trains are fast.

• Better: The trains are punctual.

• Level Up: The network offers seamless connectivity and high-frequency intervals, minimising commuter downtime.

• Basic: It is cheap.

• Better: It is affordable.

• Level Up: The fare structure is heavily subsidised to ensure it remains economically accessible to the masses.

Step-by-Step Guide: Deconstructing a Model Essay

Let’s apply these tips to a real question.

Question: Do you agree that Singapore’s public transport system is very efficient? Give reasons for your view.

Step 1: The Introduction

• The Hook: Start with a broad statement. Reference Singapore’s reputation for urban planning.

• The Context: Explain why this matters. High population density + high cost of cars (COE) = reliance on public transport.

• The Thesis: State your stand clearly. Example: “While no system is entirely flawless, I strongly agree that Singapore’s public transport system is very efficient.”

Step 2: Body Paragraphs 1 & 2 (Supporting Arguments)

Whether you are discussing physical infrastructure or technological convenience, every supporting paragraph in an O-Level essay must follow the PEEL structure. This ensures your argument is logical, substantiated, and easy for the examiner to follow.

• Point: Start with a clear topic sentence that states one specific reason for your stand. Example: “The connectivity of the network is comprehensive due to its integration.”

• Evidence: Back up your point with concrete facts, specific nouns, or examples. Do not be vague. Example: Cite the “Hub-and-Spoke” model, Integrated Transport Hubs (ITHs) like Bedok, or apps like SimplyGo.

• Explanation: This is the most important part. Explain how your evidence proves your point. Ask yourself: “So what?” Example: Explain that ITHs allow for weather-proof transfers, or that real-time data removes the uncertainty of waiting.

• Link: Conclude the paragraph by linking your point back to the main question (Efficiency). Example: “Consequently, this seamless integration significantly reduces travel time, demonstrating the system’s efficiency.”

Step 3: Body Paragraphs 3 & 4 (The Counter-Argument & Rebuttal)

Still using the PEEL structure, provide:

• The Critic’s View: Acknowledge the breakdowns and peak-hour crowds. Don’t hide this.

• The Rebuttal: Focus on solutions and comparison. For example, explain how the government continues to invest in upgrading the transport system, and show Singapore’s superiority by comparing its public transport system with those of London or New York.

Step 4: The Conclusion

Summarise without repeating word-for-word. End with a “So What?” reflection.

• Summary: Singapore’s public transport system serves as the lifeline of the nation, moving millions of people daily with a high degree of reliability and affordability.

• Final Thought: It is not merely a way to get around. It is a testament to forward-thinking governance and engineering excellence.

Ignite Your Argumentative Skills

Knowing the structure is one thing. Applying it under timed examination conditions when your adrenaline is pumping is another. Finding the right English writing class for secondary school can make the difference between a pass and a distinction.

As a leading provider of Secondary English tuition in Singapore, WRITERS AT WORK doesn’t just teach English; we build critical thinkers. Our Secondary English programmes are designed to help students move from basic points to sophisticated argumentation. We provide the current affairs knowledge, the vocabulary lists, and the consistent feedback loop necessary to master the exam.

Don’t settle for “good enough.” Give your child the tools to excel.

For more information about how WRITERS AT WORK makes a difference, feel free to explore our website, watch our YouTube videos and catch us LIVE on TikTok!

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1. What is the difference between Argumentative and Discursive essays?

This is a classic trap. An Argumentative Essay requires a strong, singular stand (e.g., “I strongly agree”). You acknowledge the opposing view only to crush it. A Discursive Essay is more balanced; you explore both sides neutrally (e.g., “There are pros and cons”) before offering a measured opinion at the end. When facing “Do you agree?” style O-Level essay questions, an Argumentative approach is usually best.

Q2. Can I use "I" in an argumentative essay?

Yes, but use it sparingly and formally. Phrases like “I strongly agree” or “In my view” are acceptable. However, avoid casual phrasing like “I think that” or “I feel like“. Instead, state your points as facts: “It is evident that…” or “Statistics show that…“

Q3. Do I need to memorise statistics?

You don’t need to memorise exact percentages (e.g., “87.4% of commuters…“), but you should know general facts. Knowing that the “Certificate of Entitlement (COE)” is expensive or that “SimplyGo” is the payment mode adds credibility. General knowledge is key for any of the social essay writing topics in English.

Q4. Must I always include a counter-argument?

Yes. In the O-Level English marking scheme, a counter-argument is essential for high marks in “Task Fulfilment.” A truly persuasive essay considers the other side. By acknowledging a flaw (e.g., “Some may argue that transport is crowded…“) and then rebutting it, you show the examiner that you are objective, mature, and capable of critical thinking. Without it, your argument may appear biased or shallow.